Cases / Public Prosecution Service of Canada
Case study
How Public Prosecution Service of Canada actually buys
Litigation and legal services.
A mixed record. 27.3% no-tender, the rest competed. Run both plays: competitive discipline on the posted opportunities, relationship positioning for the direct-award stream.
Award sizes suit small and mid-size firms: many contracts, fast cycles, and responsiveness beats depth in most of them.
The incumbents — top vendors by value
| Name | Awards | Value |
|---|
| JAMES E. FARENHOLTZ LAW CORPORATION | 6 | $58M |
| J.M. LEDRESSAY & ASSOCIATES | 8 | $53M |
| MTC LAW | 8 | $42M |
| MOUSSEAU, DELUCA, MCPHERSON, PRINCE | 8 | $31M |
| RIOPELLE GROUP PROFESSIONAL CORP | 8 | $27M |
| A K GHOSH PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION | 8 | $26M |
Where the money goes — top categories
| Name | Awards | Value |
|---|
| 041 | 307 | $427M |
| 410 | 612 | $387M |
| 41 | 107 | $107M |
| 499 | 202 | $24M |
| 460 | 135 | $14M |
| 859 | 63 | $11M |
Work with this record
See live opportunities from this buyer →Institute research