Cases / Supreme Court of Canada
Case study
How Supreme Court of Canada actually buys
Court operations and facilities.
A mixed record. 37.2% no-tender, the rest competed. Run both plays: competitive discipline on the posted opportunities, relationship positioning for the direct-award stream.
Award sizes suit small and mid-size firms: many contracts, fast cycles, and responsiveness beats depth in most of them.
The incumbents — top vendors by value
| Name | Awards | Value |
|---|
| Canadian Corps of Commissionaires | 282 | $68M |
| Ricoh Canada Inc. | 41 | $27M |
| Visiontec (2008) Ltd. | 14 | $15M |
| IT/NET - Ottawa Inc., KPMG LLP in JV | 6 | $9M |
| The Canadian Corps of Commissionaires | 25 | $7M |
| International Reporting Inc. | 7 | $7M |
Where the money goes — top categories
| Name | Awards | Value |
|---|
| 460 | 166 | $41M |
| 0460 | 134 | $35M |
| 473 | 125 | $28M |
| 0473 | 119 | $25M |
| 1245 | 22 | $18M |
| 0671 | 12 | $17M |
Work with this record
See live opportunities from this buyer →Institute research